Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit eligibility for capital goods is to be determined with reference to the dutiability of the final product on the date of receipt of the capital goods or on the later date of installation or utilisation.
Analysis: Rule 4(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 permits credit on receipt of capital goods in the factory, while Rule 6(4) bars credit on capital goods used exclusively in the manufacture of exempted goods. The earlier decisions relied on consistently treated the date of receipt as the relevant date for testing credit eligibility, and held that later changes in duty status or subsequent use do not revive a credit that was not available when the goods were received. Applying that principle, the availability of credit depends on whether the final product was dutiable when the capital goods entered the factory.
Conclusion: Credit eligibility has to be determined with reference to the dutiability of the final product on the date of receipt of the capital goods, and not on the date of installation or later utilisation. The reference is answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: For capital goods, the relevant date for determining Cenvat credit eligibility is the date of receipt in the factory, and if the capital goods are then used exclusively for exempted final products, credit is not available merely because the final products become dutiable later.