Input tax credit on capital goods cannot be carried forward after final rejection in an earlier tax period.

Input tax credit on capital goods had to be claimed in the prescribed return for the relevant period under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act and Rules, and a transitional claim was limited to the mechanism recognised by the Rules. Where the earlier rejection of the credit for the original tax period had been confirmed on appeal and had attained finality, there was no provision permitting the dealer to carry the rejected credit forward to a later assessment year. The concluded issue could not be reopened in the subsequent period, so the later claim was not maintainable and the question of law was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

---

---

Issues: Whether input tax credit on capital goods could be claimed in the later tax period after the claim for the earlier period had already been rejected and had attained finality.

Analysis: The claim related to capital goods purchased during the earlier tax period, for which revised returns and forms had been filed. The earlier rejection of the input tax credit for that period had been confirmed in appeal and had become final. Section 12 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 permits deduction of input tax on capital goods, and Rule 133(e) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules requires the claim to be made in the prescribed return, including the transitional claim contemplated by the proviso for credits already granted in Form VAT 175. The Court held that there was no provision permitting a dealer to carry forward a rejected input tax credit to a subsequent year, and that the concluded issue could not be reopened in the later assessment year.

Conclusion: The claim for input tax credit was not maintainable, and the answer to the question of law was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

---