Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (6) TMI 64

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....06,533/-. 2. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the provisions of the Act and is engaged in the manufacture of cement and ready mix concrete and semi finished products being input to other cement manufacturing companies/units viz., clinker. 3. For the assessment year 2006-07, the assessing authority after scrutinising the returns with reference to books of accounts and evidences produced by the petitioner concluded the reassessment proceedings under Section 39(1) of the Act disallowing input tax credit on the capital goods claimed at Rs. 18,06,533/-. The petitioner filed the application under Section 69(1) of the Act seeking rectification of the order of re- assessment passed under Section 39(1) of the Act. The assessing auth....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e authorities would not be a ground to reject the input tax credit when the assessee is entitled to the input tax credit in terms of Section 12 of the Act. 6. Per contra, learned Government Advocate Sri Syed Habeeb appearing for the revenue justifying the order passed by the Tribunal contends that Form VAT 170 filed by the assessee discloses the purchase of goods in the year 2005-06, the assessments were concluded for the year 2005-06 rejecting the input tax credit against which the assessee had preferred appeal before the First Appellate authority. The First Appellate Authority rejected the appeal confirming the order of appellate authority disallowing the input tax credit on capital goods claimed by the assessee which has reached final....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ther dealer in respect of the purchase of capital goods wholly or partly for use in the business of taxable goods. 2. Deduction of input tax under this Section shall be allowed only after commencement of commercial production, or sale of taxable goods or sale of any goods in the course of export out of the territory of the Indian by the registered dealer (x x x x x). Rule 133 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules provides for deduction of input tax under Section 12 which shall be subject to the following conditions: 133. Capital goods scheme - (1) Deduction of input tax under section 12 shall be subject to the following conditions. a) Xxxx b) Xxxxx c) Xxxxx d) Xxxx e) ....