TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Denies Bail but Orders Medical Transfer for Urgent CABG Treatment Balancing Legal and Health Needs.</h1> <h3>Vikramsingh Versus The Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.), Special Crime-1, New Delhi.</h3> Vikramsingh Versus The Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.), Special Crime-1, New Delhi. - TMI Issues: Application for regular bail in connection with multiple offenses under the Indian Penal Code, opposition by the respondent based on previous rejection of bail application, applicant's medical condition necessitating urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) treatment.Analysis:1. Bail Application: The judgment addresses the application for regular bail by the accused in connection with various serious offenses under the Indian Penal Code. The applicant sought bail on grounds of parity, medical treatment, old age, and delay in trial. The respondent opposed the bail application, citing the rejection of a previous bail plea by the court after the charge sheet was filed.2. Medical Condition: The applicant's medical condition emerged as a crucial aspect of the case. The defense argued that the accused required urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) treatment, which was not available at the Sub Jail in Latur where he was currently lodged. Medical documents supported the claim that the necessary medical facilities for the required treatment were unavailable at the current location.3. Previous Rejection: The judgment highlighted the previous rejection of the bail application by the court, which was upheld by the Supreme Court. The court noted that all grounds raised in the present application had been considered during the previous rejection, and the bail plea was turned down based on those reasons. The respondent emphasized that the issues had already been adjudicated on merits, and the applicant was not entitled to reopen them.4. Court's Decision: After considering the arguments and the medical documents presented, the court rejected the criminal application for bail. However, recognizing the urgent medical needs of the accused, the court directed the respondent to shift the applicant from Sub Jail Latur to Central Prison, Aurangabad, for the necessary medical treatment, specifically Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG). The court specified that after the medical treatment, the applicant should be returned to Sub Jail Latur to attend the trial.5. Final Disposition: The judgment concluded with the directions for the respondent to immediately shift the applicant to Central Prison, Aurangabad, for medical treatment and then return him to Sub Jail Latur after the treatment. With these directions, the criminal application was disposed of, addressing both the bail plea and the urgent medical needs of the accused.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
