Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the receipts from services rendered for remedial work on an oil well were chargeable as fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) and section 44DA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or assessable on presumptive basis under section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as services in connection with prospecting for, or extraction or production of, mineral oils.
Analysis: The contractual work was found to be directly connected with remedial operations on an oil well in the KG Basin, including retrieval and installation of the XMT and related operations. Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vii) excludes consideration for construction, assembly, mining or like projects from the definition of fees for technical services, and the CBDT instruction clarified that prospecting for, or extraction or production of, mineral oil falls within the mining or like project exception. Applying the pith and substance test and the wide amplitude of the words "in connection with", the work was held to be inextricably linked with mineral oil operations. The provision of section 44BB was held applicable even though the assessee was a second-line contractor, since the section does not distinguish between main contractors and subcontractors and covers services or facilities rendered in connection with such oil exploration activity.
Conclusion: The receipts were not taxable as fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) or section 44DA, and were assessable under section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.