Police station confinement counts as arrest, but explained delay and no mala fides defeated damages relief.

Actual restraint or confinement of a person within police station premises constitutes arrest for the purpose of the statutory twenty-four hour production requirement. On the facts noted, custody from the morning of 27-09-1990 until production before the Magistrate on 29-09-1990 attracted that protection, but the delay was explained by police exigencies connected with communal rioting and the record did not establish mala fides. In those circumstances, the Court declined to award damages or grant any further consequential relief.

---

---

Issues: Whether the alleged keeping of the detenue in police station custody amounted to arrest attracting the twenty-four hour limit for production before the Magistrate, and whether the petitioner was entitled to any further relief including damages.

Analysis: For the purpose of arrest, actual restraint or confinement of the person within the precincts of a police station is sufficient. On the facts recorded, the detenue was treated as having been in police custody from the morning of 27-09-1990, and production before the Magistrate only on 29-09-1990 attracted the protection under Section 57 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. However, the delay was explained by the officers being required to go to Dharwad in connection with communal rioting, and the record did not justify a finding of mala fides. In these circumstances, the Court declined to award damages or grant any further consequential relief.

Conclusion: The detention issue was answered against the petitioner on the question of further relief, and no damages were awarded.

Final Conclusion: The petition was not allowed to proceed further and was closed without any additional relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Confinement of a person within a police station constitutes arrest for the purpose of the statutory twenty-four hour limit, but where the delay in production is satisfactorily explained and lacks mala fides, no compensatory relief need be granted.

---