https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311428 Actual restraint or confinement of a person within police station premises constitutes arrest for the purpose of the statutory twenty-four hour production requirement. On the facts noted, custody from the morning of 27-09-1990 until production before the Magistrate on 29-09-1990 attracted that protection, but the delay was explained by police exigencies connected with communal rioting and the record did not establish mala fides. In those circumstances, the Court declined to award damages or grant any further consequential relief. en-us Tue, 18 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Dec 2023 14:58:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311428 Actual restraint or confinement of a person within police station premises constitutes arrest for the purpose of the statutory twenty-four hour production requirement. On the facts noted, custody from the morning of 27-09-1990 until production before the Magistrate on 29-09-1990 attracted that protection, but the delay was explained by police exigencies connected with communal rioting and the record did not establish mala fides. In those circumstances, the Court declined to award damages or grant any further consequential relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311428