Tribunal quashes assessment order citing lack of jurisdiction & evidence. Invalid assumption under Section 153C.

The Tribunal quashed the assessment order under Section 153C/143(3) for AY 2011-12, citing lack of jurisdiction and absence of incriminating material. The AO's assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C without possessing undisclosed assets was deemed invalid. The addition made under Section 68 was found unsustainable as it lacked incriminating evidence. The Tribunal clarified that notice under Section 143(2) is not mandatory for finalizing assessments under Section 153A/153C. The assessment order was held to be null and void, with the Tribunal partially allowing the Revenue's appeal and accepting the assessee's cross objections.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of jurisdiction assumed by the AO under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act.
2. Requirement of incriminating material for reassessment in case of unabated assessments.
3. Validity of the assessment order under Section 153C/143(3) without prior approval under Section 153D.
4. Requirement of notice under Section 143(2) for finalizing assessment under Section 153A/153C.
5. Merits of the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of Jurisdiction Assumed by the AO under Section 153C:
The AO issued notices under Section 153C for AY 2011-12, which was beyond the normal period of six assessment years. The assessee challenged the validity of these notices on the grounds that the AO did not have in his possession any incriminating evidence revealing income represented in the form of an asset valued at Rs. 50 Lakhs or more that had escaped assessment. The Tribunal held that the AO could not have assumed jurisdiction under Section 153C without first having in his possession the undisclosed/unaccounted asset. The Tribunal emphasized that the jurisdictional fact is sine qua non for valid assumption of jurisdiction to issue notice for AY 2011-12 and found that the AO did not have such jurisdictional fact in his possession. Therefore, the notice issued under Section 153C was held to be bad in law.

2. Requirement of Incriminating Material for Reassessment in Case of Unabated Assessments:
The Tribunal noted that the assessment for AY 2011-12 did not abate and thus could only be reassessed with reference to incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal found that the documents referred to by the AO (Pages 61 to 69 of SST-01) were part of the regular books of accounts and did not constitute incriminating material. The Tribunal held that the addition made under Section 68 of the Act was not based on any incriminating material found during the search and thus was unsustainable.

3. Validity of the Assessment Order under Section 153C/143(3) without Prior Approval under Section 153D:
The Tribunal noted that the AO had not sought prior approval from the jurisdictional Additional Commissioner of Income-tax before passing the assessment order under Section 153C/143(3). However, since the Tribunal had already quashed the assessment order for want of jurisdiction, it did not return findings on this issue, deeming it academic in nature.

4. Requirement of Notice under Section 143(2) for Finalizing Assessment under Section 153A/153C:
The Tribunal agreed with the Revenue that issuance of notice under Section 143(2) is not mandatory for finalizing assessments under Section 153A/153C. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Ashok Chaddha Vs ITO, which held that there is no specific provision in the Act requiring assessments under Section 153A to be after the issue of notice under Section 143(2).

5. Merits of the Addition Made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act:
The Tribunal noted that the AO had made an addition under Section 68 based on the proceeds received upon the sale of investments. However, since the Tribunal found that the AO had invalidly assumed jurisdiction under Section 153C and that the addition was not based on any incriminating material found during the search, the Tribunal did not adjudicate the merits of the addition, deeming it academic in nature.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal quashed the assessment order passed by the AO under Section 153C/143(3) for AY 2011-12, holding it to be a nullity for want of jurisdiction and for being unsustainable due to the absence of incriminating material. The Tribunal allowed the cross objections of the assessee and partly allowed the appeal of the Revenue.

---