Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a person claiming under a registered will could be impleaded as a legal representative under Order 22 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and whether enquiry into heirship was determinative for that purpose.
Analysis: Section 2(11) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, shows that a legal representative is not confined to a legal heir. A person who has sufficient interest to represent the estate in pending proceedings may be brought on record even if his title to the estate is disputed. The enquiry under Order 22 Rule 4 is limited to representation of the estate in the litigation and does not decide succession or heirship. The existence of a registered will in favour of the applicant gave him a reasonable basis to represent the deceased appellant's estate, and no rival claimant with a better immediate right to represent the estate had come forward.
Conclusion: The applicant was entitled to be impleaded as the legal representative of the deceased appellant, and the order rejecting substitution and recording abatement could not be sustained.