<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 314 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310021</link>
    <description>A person claiming under a registered will may be impleaded as a legal representative under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC if he has sufficient interest to represent the deceased&#039;s estate in pending proceedings. Section 2(11) CPC is not confined to a legal heir, and the enquiry at substitution stage is limited to representation of the estate, not determination of succession or heirship. Where the applicant had a registered will in his favour and no rival claimant with a better immediate right to represent the estate had appeared, substitution was treated as maintainable and rejection of substitution with abatement could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 17:37:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 314 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310021</link>
      <description>A person claiming under a registered will may be impleaded as a legal representative under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC if he has sufficient interest to represent the deceased&#039;s estate in pending proceedings. Section 2(11) CPC is not confined to a legal heir, and the enquiry at substitution stage is limited to representation of the estate, not determination of succession or heirship. Where the applicant had a registered will in his favour and no rival claimant with a better immediate right to represent the estate had appeared, substitution was treated as maintainable and rejection of substitution with abatement could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>