Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the Kerala State Co-operative Bank, District Co-operative Banks and Urban Co-operative Banks are "co-operative banks" within the meaning of the SARFAESI Act and the Banking Regulation Act, 1949; (ii) whether the SARFAESI Act is within the legislative competence of the Union so as to apply to co-operative banks notwithstanding State co-operative societies legislation; (iii) whether the Central Government notification dated 28-1-2003 validly brings such banks within the ambit of the SARFAESI Act.
Issue (i): Whether the Kerala State Co-operative Bank, District Co-operative Banks and Urban Co-operative Banks are "co-operative banks" within the meaning of the SARFAESI Act and the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.
Analysis: The relevant definitions in the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, as modified for co-operative societies, were examined along with the notification issued under the SARFAESI Act. The Kerala State Co-operative Bank answers the description of a State Co-operative Bank, the District Co-operative Banks answer the description of Central Co-operative Banks, and the Urban Co-operative Banks satisfy the requirements of Primary Co-operative Banks. The statutory classification under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules also supported the conclusion that their principal business is banking.
Conclusion: Yes. The institutions concerned are co-operative banks covered by the notified class of banks under the SARFAESI Act.
Issue (ii): Whether the SARFAESI Act is within the legislative competence of the Union so as to apply to co-operative banks notwithstanding State co-operative societies legislation.
Analysis: The creation and enforcement of security interest under the SARFAESI Act was treated as a matter falling within Entries 6 and 7 of List III, not as an encroachment on the State field under Entry 32 of List II. The Act was held to create a proprietary interest over property and not merely an alternate recovery forum. The overriding provision and the exclusion relating to agricultural land were relied on to hold that the enactment remains within parliamentary competence, and the State co-operative societies law does not negate its operation in this field.
Conclusion: Yes. The SARFAESI Act is constitutionally competent and applies to co-operative banks.
Issue (iii): Whether the Central Government notification dated 28-1-2003 validly brings such banks within the ambit of the SARFAESI Act.
Analysis: The notification was issued under the express power conferred by the SARFAESI Act to specify other banks. Since the institutions concerned fall within the statutory descriptions of co-operative banks, the notification validly extends the Act to them. The distinction between the SARFAESI Act and the recovery regime under the RDB Act was also noted to reject the challenge based on co-operative society legislation.
Conclusion: Yes. The notification is valid and effective against the petitioners.
Final Conclusion: The challenge to the applicability of the SARFAESI Act to the concerned co-operative banks failed, and the writ petitions were rejected with liberty to pursue appropriate statutory remedies under the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: A co-operative bank that falls within the statutory definition and notification under the SARFAESI Act can be subjected to its enforcement mechanism, and the Act is within Union competence because enforcement of security interest in non-agricultural property falls within the concurrent legislative field.