Indirect monetary interest in a Panchayat contract can disqualify a member where spouse shares profits by operation of law.

A Panch member is exposed to disqualification where the member's spouse, governed by the Portuguese community-of-property regime, has a contract with the Panchayat and is entitled by operation of law to share in the profits. Section 10(f) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 targets not only direct but also indirect share or monetary interest in a Panchayat contract to prevent conflict between private interest and public duty. On that footing, the spouse's statutory entitlement to the contract profits created an indirect monetary interest for the elected member, attracting disqualification under the Act.

---

---

Issues: Whether a Panch member whose spouse, governed by the community-of-property regime under the Portuguese Civil Code, has a contract with the Panchayat can be said to have an indirect share or monetary interest in that contract so as to attract disqualification under Section 10(f) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

Analysis: The disqualification under Section 10(f) is directed against a member having a direct or indirect share or monetary interest in a contract with or on behalf of the Panchayat. The provision is intended to prevent conflict between private interest and public duty, and it should not be construed narrowly. The spouses in Goa were governed by the community-of-property regime under Articles 1098 and 1108 of the Portuguese Civil Code, 1860, under which the profits and assets of the marriage become common property unless otherwise contracted. Section 5A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 also recognizes the statutory apportionment of income between such spouses. On that legal footing, the spouse of the elected member was entitled by operation of law to a share in the profits arising from the Panchayat contract.

Conclusion: The member had an indirect monetary interest in the contract and was disqualified under Section 10(f) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

---