<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 729 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309352</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the appellant had an indirect share and monetary interest in her husband&#039;s contract with the Village Panchayat, as per provisions of the Portuguese Civil Code and the Indian Income Tax Act. This interest led to her disqualification under Section 10(f) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, aimed at preventing conflicts of interest. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the disqualification and making no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2023 11:36:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 729 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309352</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the appellant had an indirect share and monetary interest in her husband&#039;s contract with the Village Panchayat, as per provisions of the Portuguese Civil Code and the Indian Income Tax Act. This interest led to her disqualification under Section 10(f) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, aimed at preventing conflicts of interest. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the disqualification and making no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>