Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the bail applicant was entitled to regular bail on the ground that the contraband samples were drawn after mixing the contents of multiple packets, contrary to Standing Order No. 1/88, and whether such defect made the rigours of Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 inapplicable.
Analysis: The sampling procedure adopted was found to be inconsistent with Standing Order No. 1/88, which requires sampling from each package/container and does not permit mixing the contents of separate packets into one container before drawing samples. The order treated the standing order as a requirement of law and held that the defective sampling caused serious prejudice to the applicant. On that basis, the Court held that the strict conditions under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 would not govern the request for bail in the same manner.
Conclusion: The applicant was held entitled to regular bail.