<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1435 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309285</link>
    <description>Sampling of narcotic packets must be drawn from each package or container separately; mixing contents of multiple packets before sampling was treated as inconsistent with Standing Order No. 1/88 and as a legal defect causing serious prejudice. On that basis, the strict bail restrictions under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 were held not to govern the request in the same manner, and regular bail was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 22:13:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1435 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309285</link>
      <description>Sampling of narcotic packets must be drawn from each package or container separately; mixing contents of multiple packets before sampling was treated as inconsistent with Standing Order No. 1/88 and as a legal defect causing serious prejudice. On that basis, the strict bail restrictions under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 were held not to govern the request in the same manner, and regular bail was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>