Petitioner's Bail Application Denied in NDPS Case; Court Emphasizes Conditions for Bail

The court dismissed the petitioner's application for regular bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in a case involving Sections 8/20/29 of the NDPS Act. The court found that the petitioner, identified as the truck driver carrying contraband, was likely aware of the illegal substance. Emphasizing the conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act for granting bail, including the need for the prosecutor to oppose the application and reasonable belief in the accused's innocence, the court concluded that no grounds for bail were established due to the petitioner's conscious possession of the contraband.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Application for regular bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
2. Admissibility and validity of evidence and statements under NDPS Act.
3. Procedure for sampling and its compliance with legal standards.
4. Application of Section 37 of NDPS Act and the conditions for granting bail.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Application for Regular Bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.:
The petitioner sought regular bail in a case under Sections 8/20/29 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution's case involved the interception of a truck carrying 386 Kgs of Ganja, with the petitioner identified as the truck driver. The petitioner was arrested along with other co-accused after the recovery of contraband from a concealed cavity in the truck.

2. Admissibility and Validity of Evidence and Statements under NDPS Act:
The petitioner’s counsel argued that the statements recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act were inadmissible, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Tofan Singh vs. State of Tamil Nadu. The counsel also contended that the petitioner was merely a driver unaware of the contraband and had no call records or monetary benefits linking him to the crime. The prosecution, however, maintained that the petitioner was in conscious possession of the contraband, as he drove the truck from Orissa to Delhi.

3. Procedure for Sampling and Its Compliance with Legal Standards:
The petitioner’s counsel challenged the procedure for obtaining samples, arguing that mixing the contents of all recovered packets before drawing samples vitiated the case property’s sanctity. Reliance was placed on previous judgments where similar procedures were deemed improper. However, the court noted that in this case, each packet was tested individually before being divided into lots for sampling. The court found that the procedure followed did not prima facie vitiate the proceedings and any prejudice could be addressed during the trial.

4. Application of Section 37 of NDPS Act and the Conditions for Granting Bail:
Under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act, bail for offences involving commercial quantities requires:
- The prosecutor must be given an opportunity to oppose the bail application.
- There must be reasonable grounds to believe that the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.

The court referred to the Supreme Court’s observations in Madan Lal and Anr. v. State of Himachal Pradesh regarding conscious possession. It concluded that the petitioner, driving the truck from Orissa to Delhi with known individuals, was likely aware of the contraband. The court also highlighted the improbability of the petitioner driving without any remuneration or benefit.

Considering the evidence and the conditions under Section 37, the court opined that no grounds for granting bail were made out. The application was accordingly dismissed.

---