<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1552 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309277</link>
    <description>In an NDPS bail context involving recovery from a vehicle driven by the accused, the statutory presumptions of possession and culpable mental state may operate where surrounding circumstances indicate prima facie knowledge of concealed contraband, and a bare assertion of being only a driver is insufficient at the bail stage to displace them. A sampling objection based on the manner in which packets were tested and segregated was treated as a matter for trial, because the packets had first tested positive and the alleged irregularity did not conclusively vitiate the prosecution case at the threshold. The material therefore did not satisfy the conditions for release on bail under the NDPS bail restrictions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 22:13:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1552 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309277</link>
      <description>In an NDPS bail context involving recovery from a vehicle driven by the accused, the statutory presumptions of possession and culpable mental state may operate where surrounding circumstances indicate prima facie knowledge of concealed contraband, and a bare assertion of being only a driver is insufficient at the bail stage to displace them. A sampling objection based on the manner in which packets were tested and segregated was treated as a matter for trial, because the packets had first tested positive and the alleged irregularity did not conclusively vitiate the prosecution case at the threshold. The material therefore did not satisfy the conditions for release on bail under the NDPS bail restrictions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>