Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after discharging the accused on consideration of the police report and material under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Magistrate could suo motu direct further investigation and require a fresh report.
Analysis: A Magistrate, on receipt of a police report under Section 173(2), may accept the report, disagree with it and drop the proceedings, or direct further investigation at the pre-cognizance stage. The power to order further investigation exists to secure a fair and effective investigation, but the judgment distinguishes that stage from the post-cognizance stage. Once cognizance is taken and the accused is discharged under Section 227, the Magistrate cannot on his own direct further investigation; that course is beyond jurisdiction. Section 173(8) continues to permit further investigation at the instance of the investigating agency, which may seek permission and file a supplementary report.
Conclusion: The order directing further investigation after discharge was impermissible and without jurisdiction, and the accused succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The discharge order could not be accompanied by a suo motu direction for further investigation, though the investigating agency remained free to seek further investigation under the Code.
Ratio Decidendi: After discharge of the accused at the post-cognizance stage, a Magistrate has no power to suo motu order further investigation; such power may be exercised only at the pre-cognizance stage or on an application by the investigating agency under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.