Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order of compulsory retirement issued under Rule 74(b)(ii) of the Bihar Service Code was a bona fide retirement in public interest or a punitive order passed on extraneous considerations and therefore unconstitutional.
Analysis: Rule 74(b)(ii) empowers the appointing authority to require compulsory retirement in public interest, but the power must be exercised bona fide and cannot be used as a disguise for punishment. The form of the order is not conclusive. Where the surrounding material shows that the order is founded on allegations of misconduct, grave financial irregularities, or a pre-judged adverse report, the Court may lift the veil and examine the true character of the action. If the real basis of the order is misconduct, the order is punitive in substance and attracts the protection of Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India. An order based on collateral considerations and passed without fairness is also arbitrary and contrary to natural justice.
Conclusion: The compulsory retirement order was not bona fide, was passed for collateral purposes as a punitive measure, and was illegal.
Ratio Decidendi: Even if an order of compulsory retirement is worded innocuously, it is liable to be struck down where the record shows that it was ically founded on misconduct and used as a cloak for punishment rather than as a bona fide measure in public interest.