Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was within limitation and whether delay beyond the statutory condonable period could be excused on the ground that the order was received later and the tribunal was on summer vacation.
Analysis: The limitation period for an appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 runs from the date of pronouncement of the order by the Adjudicating Authority, not from the date of knowledge or receipt of a copy. Only the time requisite for obtaining a certified copy can be excluded. The statutory scheme does not permit awaiting a free copy under the Companies Act, 2013 for computing limitation. The tribunal's summer vacation did not assist the appellant because filing was permitted during the vacation. The delay beyond the further condonable period of fifteen days could not be enlarged in view of the binding Supreme Court rulings.
Conclusion: The delay was not condonable and the appeal was barred by limitation.