TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court dismisses Civil Revision Petition challenging cheque ink comparison, upholding decision on ink age indeterminability.</h1> <h3>Panneerselvam Versus S. Bakkiyam</h3> The court dismissed the petitioner's Civil Revision Petition challenging the rejection of the application to forward a cheque for ink comparison. The ... - Issues Involved: The petitioner questions the order dismissing the application to forward a cheque for ink comparison to forensic experts under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act.Details of the Judgment:Issue 1: Application for Forwarding Cheque for Ink ComparisonThe petitioner sought to send the cheque for ink comparison as the ink used for signature differed from that used for dates and amounts. The petitioner argued that the non-MICR NCE coded cheque was issued long back, supporting the need for comparison. However, the court dismissed the application, citing the unavailability of scientific methods to assess ink age in Tamil Nadu, as per a previous court decision.Issue 2: Validity of Court's DecisionThe court upheld the decision to reject the plea for ink comparison, stating that the age of the ink or variations in the cheque's ink were not determinable. The court emphasized that bank records could establish the cheque's issuance date, making signature comparisons unnecessary. Additionally, the delay in filing the application and the court's previous ruling on ink age assessment further supported the dismissal of the petitioner's request.In conclusion, the Civil Revision Petition challenging the rejection of the application for ink comparison was dismissed, and the Connected M.P. was closed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
