https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305058 The court dismissed the petitioner's Civil Revision Petition challenging the rejection of the application to forward a cheque for ink comparison. The court upheld the decision, emphasizing that the age of the ink or variations in the cheque's ink were indeterminable. Bank records could establish the cheque's issuance date, rendering signature comparisons unnecessary. The court also noted the unavailability of scientific methods to assess ink age in Tamil Nadu, as per a previous court ruling. The Connected M.P. was closed following the dismissal of the petition. en-us Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:44:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305058 The court dismissed the petitioner's Civil Revision Petition challenging the rejection of the application to forward a cheque for ink comparison. The court upheld the decision, emphasizing that the age of the ink or variations in the cheque's ink were indeterminable. Bank records could establish the cheque's issuance date, rendering signature comparisons unnecessary. The court also noted the unavailability of scientific methods to assess ink age in Tamil Nadu, as per a previous court ruling. The Connected M.P. was closed following the dismissal of the petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305058