National Company Law Tribunal orders liquidation of M/s Jas Infrastructure and Power Limited The National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata, ordered the liquidation of Corporate Debtor, M/s Jas Infrastructure and Power Limited, due to the lack of a ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
National Company Law Tribunal orders liquidation of M/s Jas Infrastructure and Power Limited
The National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata, ordered the liquidation of Corporate Debtor, M/s Jas Infrastructure and Power Limited, due to the lack of a resolution plan and the Committee of Creditors' decision in favor of liquidation with 98.45% voting share. The Tribunal appointed Mr. Kannan Tiruvengadam as the Liquidator, rejecting objections raised regarding fees and the law of limitation. The order included public announcements, ceasing the moratorium, and directions for the Liquidator to proceed with the liquidation process as per the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Issues involved: 1. Application for liquidation under Section 33(2) of I & B Code, 2016. 2. CoC's decision for liquidation due to lack of resolution plan. 3. Appointment of Liquidator and objections raised. 4. Legal objection regarding the law of limitation. 5. Order for liquidation and directions.
Issue 1: Application for liquidation under Section 33(2) of I & B Code, 2016: The Resolution Professional (RP) filed an application under Section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, M/s Jas Infrastructure and Power Limited. The application was admitted due to delays caused by the pandemic situation and listed for an urgent hearing.
Issue 2: CoC's decision for liquidation due to lack of resolution plan: The Committee of Creditors (CoC) convened multiple meetings but did not receive any resolution plan within the stipulated time. Consequently, with 98.45% voting share, the CoC decided in favor of liquidation of the company. The CoC also approved the appointment of a Liquidator and passed necessary resolutions for the liquidation process.
Issue 3: Appointment of Liquidator and objections raised: The RP expressed unwillingness to continue as the Liquidator due to a demand for reduced fees by the CoC. The CoC's recommendation for a new Liquidator was challenged, citing inconsistency with Section 34 of the Code. The Tribunal appointed a new Liquidator, Mr. Kannan Tiruvengadam, based on competency and location proximity to the registered office.
Issue 4: Legal objection regarding the law of limitation: The suspended board of the Corporate Debtor raised objections regarding the law of limitation, claiming the original Financial Creditor's claim was time-barred. However, the Tribunal rejected the objection, stating that no favorable order reversing the admission had been obtained, and no pending appeals were highlighted.
Issue 5: Order for liquidation and directions: Considering the lack of a resolution plan and the CoC's decision, the Tribunal ordered the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, M/s Jas Infrastructure and Power Limited. The order included appointing Mr. Kannan Tiruvengadam as the Liquidator, issuing public announcements, ceasing the moratorium, and directing the Liquidator to proceed with the liquidation process as per the Code and regulations.
This comprehensive analysis covers the key issues addressed in the judgment by the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata, regarding the liquidation process of the mentioned Corporate Debtor.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.