Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents could insist that the passport application of a child raised by a single mother must contain the biological father's name, and whether the passport could be issued without such entry.
Analysis: The requirement to mention the biological father's name was held to be enforceable only if mandated by law. Clause 4.5 of Chapter 8 of Passport Manual 2010 was found inapplicable because it dealt with deletion of a parent's name consequent to divorce and not with first-time entry in the passport. The Court relied on the principle that where the father has abandoned the child or is uninvolved, the welfare of the child and the child's identity and autonomy assume primacy. The Court also noted that the updated online form permitted one of father, mother or legal guardian to be furnished, and that technology could not defeat legal entitlement.
Conclusion: The respondents could not insist on the biological father's name, and the passport application was directed to be accepted and processed without that entry.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded, and the passport authority was required to modify its software and issue the passport on the basis of the mother's details alone.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of a legal requirement, a passport authority cannot compel disclosure of the biological father's name where doing so would undermine the child's welfare and identity, particularly in a single-parent situation.