<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1587 - DELHIHIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303525</link>
    <description>A passport authority cannot insist on the biological father&#039;s name in a child&#039;s first passport application unless a legal requirement expressly mandates it. The Delhi High Court held that the Passport Manual provision relied on was inapplicable because it addressed deletion of a parent&#039;s name after divorce, not initial entry of parentage details. The Court emphasised that where the father has abandoned the child or is uninvolved, the child&#039;s welfare, identity and autonomy take primacy. It also noted that the online form allowed particulars of the father, mother or legal guardian, and that software could not override legal entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:28:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1587 - DELHIHIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303525</link>
      <description>A passport authority cannot insist on the biological father&#039;s name in a child&#039;s first passport application unless a legal requirement expressly mandates it. The Delhi High Court held that the Passport Manual provision relied on was inapplicable because it addressed deletion of a parent&#039;s name after divorce, not initial entry of parentage details. The Court emphasised that where the father has abandoned the child or is uninvolved, the child&#039;s welfare, identity and autonomy take primacy. It also noted that the online form allowed particulars of the father, mother or legal guardian, and that software could not override legal entitlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>