TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to be enlarged on bail in a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The application was considered in the context of the alleged offence under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the power under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court noted the seriousness of the allegations and the stage of the matter, and declined to express any opinion on the merits while assessing whether bail should be granted.
Conclusion: Bail was declined and the petitioner was not enlarged on bail.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
