Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail in a prosecution for offences under the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The petitioner had remained in custody since 01.08.2022, the investigation had been completed, and the charge-sheet had already been filed. He had also deposited about 10% of the alleged evaded tax amount. The Court granted bail without expressing any opinion on the merits and imposed conditions including execution of bond, sureties, compliance with Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, deposit of passport, and a restriction on foreign without prior permission.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to be enlarged on bail.
Ratio Decidendi: Where investigation is complete, the charge-sheet has been filed, and relevant bail conditions can secure appearance, bail may be granted in a GST prosecution without adjudicating the merits of the .