TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the accused-petitioner was entitled to bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with offences under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The application was considered in the context of the seriousness of the alleged CGST offences and the fact that similar bail requests in identical matters had been declined by coordinate Benches of the Court. The Court also noted the submissions regarding filing of the charge-sheet and the cited orders relied upon by both sides, but declined to express any opinion on the merits of the prosecution case.
Conclusion: Bail was not granted and the petitioner was not found entitled to relief at that stage.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
