Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, accused of an offence under Section 132(1) of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and in custody after filing of the charge sheet, was entitled to bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: The custody period, completion of investigation, filing of the charge sheet, and the nature of the material relied upon were taken into account. The Court also relied upon the Supreme Court's bail approach in a similar tax-offence matter, and noted that the decision was being made without expressing any opinion on the merits. The grant of bail was supported by the conditions that the petitioner would remain available to face trial and comply with the safeguards imposed by the trial court, including those under Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to bail.