Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the earlier order extending time for payment under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 could stand in view of the mandatory requirement to pay the amount within the time prescribed under the scheme.
Analysis: Section 127(5) of the Finance Act, 2019 required payment in the manner directed by the designated committee, and Rule 7 of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 required the declarant to pay electronically the amount indicated in Form SVLDRS-4 on or before the prescribed date. These provisions were not taken into account in the earlier order granting extension of time.
Conclusion: The earlier order was recalled and the writ petition was dismissed.
Final Conclusion: Relief under the scheme was held to be governed by the mandatory statutory timeline, and the petitioner obtained no relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tax settlement scheme prescribes a mandatory mode and time for payment, the court cannot extend that statutory deadline by judicial order.