Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Court could extend the time for payment under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 and direct acceptance of payment after expiry of the scheme period.
Analysis: The payment obligation under the scheme was required to be discharged within the time stipulated in the designated form and the scheme itself was a one-time, time-bound amnesty measure for legacy disputes. The Court noted that the petitioner failed to make payment within the prescribed period, that the scheme had come to an end, and that there was no provision enabling extension of time beyond the cut-off date. It also relied on the consistent view taken by other High Courts that the scheme cannot be kept alive or made operational by judicial direction after its expiry, particularly where the claimant approached belatedly.
Conclusion: The Court held that it could not extend the scheme or direct acceptance of payment after the expiry of the prescribed period, and the relief sought by the petitioner was not maintainable.