Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Court could extend the time for payment under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 and compel acceptance of the declared tax amount after the scheme period had expired.
Analysis: The scheme was a time-bound legislative amnesty for liquidation of legacy disputes, and the amount determined by the designated committee had to be paid within the period prescribed by the scheme and the relevant rule. The petitioner did not make payment within the original period or the extended cut-off date, and the statutory framework did not provide for further enlargement of time. The Court also noted that the matter was brought belatedly, long after the last date for payment, and that the consistent view of other High Courts was that the scheme could not be kept alive or made operational by judicial direction beyond its stipulated period.
Conclusion: The request for extension of time and for enforcement of the scheme beyond its cut-off date was rejected, and the petition failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A time-bound statutory settlement scheme cannot be judicially extended beyond its prescribed period in the absence of enabling provision, and courts cannot direct its operation contrary to its express time limits.