Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Sessions Judge was justified in cancelling the bail granted to the applicant and remitting the bail application for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The alleged conduct involved circular trading and issuance of fake invoices for fraudulent availment of input tax credit under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, with investigation still in progress and the alleged tax evasion running into a very large amount. The earlier bail order had substantially proceeded on the applicant's willingness to compound the offence and to deposit part of the amount, but compounding under the statutory scheme requires payment of tax, interest and penalty in accordance with the competent authority's determination. In these circumstances, the foundational basis of the grant of bail was found to be vulnerable, and cancellation of bail was not treated as an impermissible interference with liberty on the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The cancellation of bail and remand of the application for reconsideration were upheld.
Final Conclusion: The challenge to the impugned order failed, and the applicant was required to surrender, with the trial court directed to decide the bail application afresh on its own merits.
Ratio Decidendi: Where bail is granted on a premature or unsustainable basis connected to compounding in a serious fiscal offence under active investigation, the appellate court may validly cancel the bail if the original order is found to be unjustified on the facts.