Special statute bail jurisdiction requires filing before the Special Court, with appeals heard only by a Division Bench.

Where a special statute vests exclusive trial jurisdiction in the Special Court and separately provides an appeal against bail orders, bail must be sought first before the Special Court and the High Court's original jurisdiction under Sections 439 or 482 of the CrPC is excluded. An appeal against grant or refusal of bail under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 lies only within the statutory appellate structure and must be heard by a Division Bench of two Judges of the High Court. The clarification confirms that concurrent original and appellate remedies do not coexist in this regime.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether an appeal from an order of the Special Court granting or refusing bail under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 lies only to a Bench of two Judges of the High Court. (ii) Whether, where offences under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act, 1999 and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 are triable by the Special Court, an original bail application is maintainable before the High Court under Section 439 or Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Issue (i): Whether an appeal from an order of the Special Court granting or refusing bail under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 lies only to a Bench of two Judges of the High Court.

Analysis: The statutory scheme was read as a whole. Section 21(1) makes appeals from judgments, sentences or orders of the Special Court lie to the High Court, excluding interlocutory orders, while Section 21(4) specifically carves out bail orders as appealable. Section 21(2) then mandates that every appeal under Section 21(1) be heard by a Bench of two Judges. The Court held that Section 21(4) creates an exception for bail orders within the appellate structure of Section 21, and that reading the provision purposively and in context leaves no room for a Single Judge to hear such appeals.

Conclusion: The appeal against an order granting or refusing bail under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 lies only to a Bench of two Judges of the High Court.

Issue (ii): Whether, where offences under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act, 1999 and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 are triable by the Special Court, an original bail application is maintainable before the High Court under Section 439 or Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Analysis: The Court relied on the scheme conferring exclusive jurisdiction on the Special Court for scheduled offences and connected offences, together with the powers of the Special Court to try such offences as a Court of Session. It held that, in such a statutory framework, the Special Court is the forum for bail applications and the High Court cannot be approached in original jurisdiction under Section 439 or Section 482 of the Code for the same matter. Earlier decisions construing analogous special statutes were followed to reject the argument that concurrent original and appellate remedies could coexist.

Conclusion: The original bail application was not maintainable before the High Court and had to be made before the Special Court.

Final Conclusion: The clarification was issued against the applicant's interpretation of the earlier order, affirming that bail matters under the special statutory regime must originate before the Special Court and that any appeal lies only before a Division Bench of the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a special statute creates an exclusive trial forum and separately provides an appeal against bail orders, the bail application lies before the Special Court and the statutory appeal from that order must be heard by the Bench prescribed by the Act; original High Court jurisdiction under the Code is excluded.

---