TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Sets Aside Division Bench Order, Instructs Fresh Review by High Court</h1> <h3>Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan Versus Ram Charan</h3> Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan Versus Ram Charan - TMI Issues:Violation of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 by the appellant leading to illegal termination of respondent's service. Challenge to the Labour Court's award by the appellant. Dismissal of the writ petition by the High Court on grounds of delay and lack of merit. Lack of discussion on merits by the Division Bench of the High Court. Stay order by the Supreme Court on the operation of the Labour Court's award.Analysis:The respondent, initially appointed as a Pump Driver on a temporary basis, alleged termination without notice. The Conciliation Officer rejected the claim based on muster roll evidence showing 197 days of work. High Court dismissed the respondent's writ petition seeking reinstatement. Subsequent reference to the Labour Court led to an award in favor of the respondent, citing violation of Section 25F and ordering reinstatement with back-wages. The appellant challenged this award in a writ petition, contending the respondent's failure to prove working for 240 days. The High Court upheld the Labour Court's decision, leading to the appellant's appeal before the Division Bench.The Division Bench dismissed the appeal citing a 321-day delay and lack of merit, without discussing the contentions adequately. The Supreme Court found the Division Bench's order lacking justification and remitted the case for fresh consideration. A stay order was issued on the recovery of back-wages pending the High Court's decision. The Supreme Court emphasized the need for a speaking order and directed the High Court to reevaluate the case on merit and in accordance with the law, disregarding any observations made in the current judgment.In conclusion, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Division Bench's order and instructing a fresh review by the High Court. The interim order for reinstatement and stay on back-wages recovery remains in effect until the High Court's decision. The case is to be handled without cost, and the original record is to be returned to the High Court for further proceedings.
TaxTMI 