Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional application required hearing on merits and whether interim protection by way of stay of the pending proceedings was warranted.
Analysis: The Court found prima facie merit in the challenge to the summons schedule and the warrant of arrest issued at the first instance under Section 87 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court noted the grievance that the petitioner had insufficient time to appear and that the warrant had been issued without indicating whether it was bailable or non-bailable. Pending service and further hearing, the Court granted interim protection.
Conclusion: The petitioner was granted interim relief, and further proceedings before the Chief Judicial Magistrate were stayed for eight weeks.