<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1531 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298703</link>
    <description>Prima facie merit was found in the challenge to the summons schedule and the arrest warrant issued at the first instance under the Code of Criminal Procedure, with the Court noting that insufficient time had been given to appear and that the warrant did not indicate whether it was bailable or non-bailable. Pending service and further hearing, interim protection was granted. Further proceedings before the Chief Judicial Magistrate were stayed for eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1531 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298703</link>
      <description>Prima facie merit was found in the challenge to the summons schedule and the arrest warrant issued at the first instance under the Code of Criminal Procedure, with the Court noting that insufficient time had been given to appear and that the warrant did not indicate whether it was bailable or non-bailable. Pending service and further hearing, interim protection was granted. Further proceedings before the Chief Judicial Magistrate were stayed for eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>