Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the successive bail application could be entertained on the basis of filing of the charge sheet as a substantial change in circumstance, and whether the order granting bail called for cancellation under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: For cancellation of bail, very cogent and overwhelming circumstances are required. The filing of the charge sheet after rejection of the earlier bail application was treated as a substantial change in circumstance because, after filing of the charge sheet, the accused is entitled to the prosecution material under Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the Court may reassess the case on that basis. The Court also held that material available with the investigating agency, including text messages and chats relied upon by the trial court, could be considered while deciding liberty, and that no supervening circumstance or misuse of liberty was shown to justify cancellation.
Conclusion: The filing of the charge sheet constituted a sufficient change in circumstance for fresh consideration of bail, and no ground was made out for cancellation of the bail already granted.
Final Conclusion: The application for cancellation of bail was rejected and the earlier bail order was allowed to stand.
Ratio Decidendi: Cancellation of bail already granted requires cogent and overwhelming grounds, and filing of the charge sheet after an earlier rejection of bail is a substantial change in circumstance warranting fresh consideration of the accused's liberty on the basis of the prosecution material.