<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1388 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298666</link>
    <description>Cancellation of bail already granted requires cogent and overwhelming grounds, and mere reconsideration is not justified absent supervening circumstances or misuse of liberty. Filing of the charge sheet after an earlier rejection of bail was treated as a substantial change in circumstance because the accused then becomes entitled to prosecution material under Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, enabling a fresh assessment of liberty. Material with the investigating agency, including text messages and chats relied on by the trial court, could be considered for that purpose. On the facts stated, no ground was shown for cancellation, and the earlier bail order was allowed to stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2021 18:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1388 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298666</link>
      <description>Cancellation of bail already granted requires cogent and overwhelming grounds, and mere reconsideration is not justified absent supervening circumstances or misuse of liberty. Filing of the charge sheet after an earlier rejection of bail was treated as a substantial change in circumstance because the accused then becomes entitled to prosecution material under Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, enabling a fresh assessment of liberty. Material with the investigating agency, including text messages and chats relied on by the trial court, could be considered for that purpose. On the facts stated, no ground was shown for cancellation, and the earlier bail order was allowed to stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>