Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the allegations of acquisition of wealth disproportionate to known sources of income, a preliminary enquiry by the CBI was warranted and whether the writ petition could be rejected at the threshold.
Analysis: The allegations were supported by voluminous material including sale deeds, income-tax returns, wealth-tax returns, assessment orders, charts and photographs, while the respondents contested the factual foundation. The Court held that such disputed and detailed questions concerning acquisition, valuation and source of funds could not be effectively examined on the writ record and required scrutiny by an independent investigating agency with technical assistance. The petition was not rejected on maintainability grounds merely because the allegations were raised in a political context, and the Court found that a preliminary enquiry was necessary in public interest.
Conclusion: A preliminary enquiry by the CBI into the alleged acquisition of wealth by respondent Nos. 2 to 5 was directed.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded to the extent that the matter was sent for independent investigation, with further action to follow depending on the result of the preliminary enquiry.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a writ petition discloses a prima facie case of alleged disproportionate assets supported by material requiring technical scrutiny, the Court may direct an independent preliminary enquiry by the CBI instead of dismissing the matter at the threshold.