Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court, in exercise of its inherent powers, can expunge irrelevant and unjustified remarks made by a subordinate criminal court against a person who was not a party or witness to the proceeding, and whether such power could be invoked on the facts of the case.
Analysis: Section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure preserves the High Court's inherent power to make orders necessary to secure the ends of justice. That power does not create a new jurisdiction, but it does recognise an extraordinary authority which may be exercised where no express provision affords relief and where the impugned remarks are wholly irrelevant, without foundation, and likely to cause serious harm. The inviolability of a judgment extends to its integral parts, namely the verdict and reasons, but not to alien matter unnecessarily incorporated in it. Expunction of such irrelevant passages does not amount to altering the merits of the judgment. At the same time, the power must be used with great caution and only in exceptional cases so that judicial independence is not undermined. On the facts, the remarks characterising the medical officer's report as careless were not shown to be wholly unjustified or likely to cause irreparable harm.
Conclusion: The High Court had inherent power in appropriate cases to expunge such remarks, but this was not a fit case for its exercise.
Ratio Decidendi: A High Court has inherent power under Section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure to expunge only those remarks in a subordinate court's judgment that are wholly irrelevant, unjustified, and harmful, and only when such relief is necessary to secure the ends of justice without affecting the substance of the judgment.