Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the personal guarantor was maintainable and fit to be allowed, and whether the interim moratorium and appointment of the resolution professional followed.
Analysis: The application was supported by the deed of guarantee, invocation of the guarantee, demand notice, proof of service, and the absence of any response from the personal guarantor. The record showed a subsisting default in discharge of the guaranteed debt. The petition was filed through an authorised resolution professional, and the requirements under the insolvency framework for initiating proceedings against a personal guarantor were satisfied. In consequence, the interim moratorium commenced from the date of filing of the application, and the resolution professional's appointment was confirmed for the purposes of inquiry and report under the Code.
Conclusion: The application under section 95 was allowed, the interim moratorium took effect, and the resolution professional was confirmed to proceed in accordance with the Code.