Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition was maintainable to enforce parity in pay scales for employees of a private educational institution, and whether the appellants were entitled to equal pay with Government employees.
Analysis: The institution served the public function of imparting education, and the employees were appointed to perform duties connected with that function. Executive instructions of the Government conferred a claim to parity in pay scales, and the absence of a statutory rule did not, in the circumstances, defeat the remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The availability of another remedy did not bar writ relief where public interest was involved and the claim was to enforce a benefit already recognized by the Government.
Conclusion: The writ petition was maintainable, and the appellants were entitled to equal pay on par with Government employees under Article 39(d) of the Constitution of India.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the writ was granted, affirming enforceability of pay parity claims in writ jurisdiction for employees of a private educational institution performing a public function.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a private educational institution discharges a public function and Government instructions recognise pay parity, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 can be invoked to enforce equal pay for equal work.