https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296249 A private educational institution performing a public function can be subjected to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where employees seek enforcement of Government-recognised pay parity. The absence of a statutory rule did not defeat relief, because executive instructions had already recognised the claim and the availability of another remedy did not bar writ intervention in the public interest context. The employees were held entitled to equal pay on par with Government employees under Article 39(d), and the writ was granted to enforce parity in pay scales. en-us Fri, 21 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296249 A private educational institution performing a public function can be subjected to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where employees seek enforcement of Government-recognised pay parity. The absence of a statutory rule did not defeat relief, because executive instructions had already recognised the claim and the availability of another remedy did not bar writ intervention in the public interest context. The employees were held entitled to equal pay on par with Government employees under Article 39(d), and the writ was granted to enforce parity in pay scales. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296249