Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an application under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 was maintainable to restore an insolvency application disposed of on settlement, after alleged default in compliance with the settlement terms.
Analysis: The insolvency application had been disposed of on the basis of a settlement recorded before the Tribunal, with liberty to file a fresh application in the event of non-compliance. The subsequent default in payment under the settlement was treated as sufficient cause to invoke the Tribunal's inherent powers. The objection that the applicant must only file a fresh application was rejected as a technical plea that could not defeat enforcement of the settlement recorded before the Tribunal. The objection regarding disqualification of the directors was also repelled.
Conclusion: The application was allowed and the insolvency application was restored to file.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a proceeding is disposed of on recorded settlement terms, the Tribunal may exercise inherent powers under Rule 11 to restore the proceeding upon breach of the settlement, and a liberty to file a fresh application does not preclude restoration in appropriate cases.