Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (9) TMI 1170 - Board - SEBI

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        SEBI issues Order in Insider Trading Case The SEBI issued an Ad-Interim Ex-Parte Order in a case involving insider trading activities in shares of a company. The investigation revealed that ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            SEBI issues Order in Insider Trading Case

                            The SEBI issued an Ad-Interim Ex-Parte Order in a case involving insider trading activities in shares of a company. The investigation revealed that insiders traded shares while in possession of unpublished price sensitive information, violating regulations. The order impounded the unlawful notional loss avoided by the insiders and directed freezing of their bank and demat accounts. The individuals were prohibited from disposing of assets until the impounded amounts were credited to an Escrow Account. They were required to provide an asset inventory and show cause why further directions, including disgorgement and market access prohibition, should not be issued.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Insider Trading
                            2. Unlawful Notional Loss Avoided
                            3. Communication of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information (UPSI)
                            4. Code of Conduct Violations

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Insider Trading:
                            The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) conducted an investigation into suspected insider trading activities in the shares of Tara Jewels Limited (TJL) during the period from October 01, 2017, to December 31, 2017. The investigation aimed to determine if certain entities had traded in TJL shares while in possession of unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI), in violation of SEBI Act, 1992, and SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 (PIT Regulations). The investigation revealed that Rajeev Vasant Sheth, Aarti Sheth, and Divya Sheth, all insiders, traded shares of TJL while in possession of UPSI regarding the company's poor financial performance for the quarter ended September 30, 2017. This UPSI period was determined to be from October 02, 2017, to November 29, 2017. The investigation found that Rajeev Vasant Sheth sold 30,93,498 shares, Aarti Sheth sold her entire holding of 1,14,440 shares, and Divya Sheth sold her entire holding of 1,14,440 shares during the UPSI period, thereby indulging in insider trading to avoid future losses.

                            2. Unlawful Notional Loss Avoided:
                            The investigation observed that the quarterly financial results of TJL for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, were disclosed to the stock exchanges after trading hours on November 29, 2017. The unlawful notional loss avoided by the insiders was computed using the methodology: Unlawful loss avoided = [No. of shares sold while in possession of UPSI (A) x Weighted average sale price (B)] - [No. of shares sold while in possession of UPSI (A) x Closing price on the day of UPSI becoming public (C)]. The overall unlawful notional loss avoided by Rajeev Vasant Sheth, Aarti Sheth, and Divya Sheth was calculated to be Rs. 1,26,59,481.50, Rs. 2,09,930.40, and Rs. 9,62,060.70, respectively.

                            3. Communication of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information (UPSI):
                            Regulation 3(1) of the PIT Regulations prohibits insiders from communicating UPSI except for legitimate purposes. It was alleged that Rajeev Vasant Sheth communicated/provided/allowed access to UPSI to his daughters Aarti Sheth and Divya Sheth, who traded in TJL shares while in possession of UPSI. Thus, Rajeev Vasant Sheth was alleged to have violated Regulation 3(1) of the PIT Regulations.

                            4. Code of Conduct Violations:
                            The code of conduct for prevention of insider trading followed by TJL required all specified persons to not enter into an opposite transaction within six months following a prior transaction. The investigation found that Rajeev Vasant Sheth violated this code by selling 1,36,720 shares and purchasing 1,12,000 shares of TJL on October 10, 2017, thereby executing contra trades. Additionally, the code required specified persons to obtain pre-clearance for trades above a certain threshold. Rajeev Vasant Sheth, Aarti Sheth, and Divya Sheth did not obtain pre-clearance for their trades during the investigation period, violating Clause 6 of Schedule B read with Sub-Regulation (1) and (2) of Regulation 9 of the PIT Regulations.

                            Order:
                            The SEBI issued an Ad-Interim Ex-Parte Order to impound the alleged unlawful notional loss avoided by Rajeev Vasant Sheth, Aarti Sheth, and Divya Sheth. The amounts to be impounded were Rs. 1,26,59,481.50 for Rajeev Vasant Sheth, Rs. 2,09,930.40 for Aarti Sheth, and Rs. 9,62,060.70 for Divya Sheth. These amounts were to be credited to an interest-bearing Escrow Account in a Nationalized Bank, with a lien in favor of SEBI. The SEBI also directed banks and depositories to freeze the bank and demat accounts of the implicated individuals, except for the transfer of funds to the Escrow Account. The individuals were further directed not to dispose of or alienate any of their assets until the unlawful loss avoided was credited to the Escrow Account. They were also required to provide a full inventory of their assets within seven working days of the order. The SEBI called upon the individuals to show cause why suitable directions, including disgorgement of the unlawful loss avoided and prohibition from accessing the securities market, should not be issued against them. The order was to come into force immediately and remain in effect until further orders.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found