Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital gains arising from the joint development agreement were taxable in assessment year 2007-08 or assessment year 2014-15, and whether transfer had occurred within the meaning of section 2(47)(v) when possession was handed over to the developer.
Analysis: The agreement was entered into in 2006 and possession of the property was handed over to the developer in compliance with the development arrangement. The facts showed that the developer had acted upon the agreement and the transaction had gone through, unlike a case where the arrangement never materialised. Once possession was delivered and the conditions akin to part performance were satisfied, the transfer fell within section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Capital gains therefore accrued in the year in which the transfer took place, and not merely on the later completion or registration of constructed units. The reasoning in the decision concerning hypothetical income did not apply on these facts.
Conclusion: The capital gains were taxable in assessment year 2007-08 and not in assessment year 2014-15. The Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where possession is handed over under a development agreement and the transaction satisfies section 2(47)(v) read with part performance principles, transfer is complete for capital gains purposes in the year of such handing over, even if formal conveyance or registration occurs later.