<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1867 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292935</link>
    <description>Where possession is handed over under a joint development agreement and the arrangement is acted upon, transfer is complete for capital gains purposes under section 2(47)(v) read with part-performance principles in the year of handing over, even if formal conveyance or registration occurs later. Applying that principle, the capital gains from the development agreement accrued in assessment year 2007-08, not assessment year 2014-15. The reasoning on hypothetical income was inapplicable because the transaction had materialised and the developer had proceeded under the agreement. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 22:05:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1867 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292935</link>
      <description>Where possession is handed over under a joint development agreement and the arrangement is acted upon, transfer is complete for capital gains purposes under section 2(47)(v) read with part-performance principles in the year of handing over, even if formal conveyance or registration occurs later. Applying that principle, the capital gains from the development agreement accrued in assessment year 2007-08, not assessment year 2014-15. The reasoning on hypothetical income was inapplicable because the transaction had materialised and the developer had proceeded under the agreement. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>