Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the delay in filing the appeal before the first appellate authority was liable to be condoned on the basis of reasonable cause; (ii) whether long-term capital gains arising from the joint development agreement dated 27.06.2006 were taxable in the assessment year 2014-15 or in the assessment year 2007-08.
Issue (i): Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the first appellate authority was liable to be condoned on the basis of reasonable cause.
Analysis: The explanation that the assessee was abroad when the assessment order was served was accepted as a reasonable cause. The delay was held to be covered by the statutory concept of reasonable cause, and the appeal was treated as maintainable for adjudication.
Conclusion: The delay was condoned in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether long-term capital gains arising from the joint development agreement dated 27.06.2006 were taxable in the assessment year 2014-15 or in the assessment year 2007-08.
Analysis: The transfer was held to have taken place when the joint development agreement was executed and physical possession of the land was handed over to the developer. The Tribunal followed its earlier co-ordinate bench decisions on identical facts and held that the later allocation agreement dated 10.07.2013 did not postpone the incidence of tax. The effect of transfer under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, was applied, and the argument based on the subsequent sharing arrangement was rejected.
Conclusion: The capital gains were held taxable in assessment year 2007-08 and not in assessment year 2014-15, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The additions made on account of long-term capital gains for the impugned assessment year were deleted, and the appeal succeeded on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: In a joint development agreement, where possession is handed over to the developer, the transfer for capital gains purposes occurs on that date under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and a later allocation agreement does not shift the year of taxability.