Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an election petition was liable to be dismissed in limine for non-service of copies of schedules and annexures along with the copy of the petition under the election law provisions.
Analysis: The statutory requirement was confined to service of as many copies of the election petition as there were respondents, with each copy attested as a true copy. The further requirements regarding material facts, particulars of corrupt practices, verification, affidavit, and signed schedules or annexures were also satisfied on the facts. The schedules and documents accompanying the petition were not treated as forming an integral part of the election petition for the purpose of compulsory service. A prior decision on the same statutory scheme had already held that documents produced as evidence are not part of the petition itself, and the later decision relied on by the petitioner did not depart from that principle.
Conclusion: The petition was not liable to be rejected in limine, and the High Court's refusal to dismiss the election petition was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of service under the election law, only the election petition itself and the statutory copies required by the provision must be served, and documents or schedules filed merely as evidence are not automatically an integral part of the petition so as to attract dismissal for non-service.